Standardised Testing - The Oh-So Wrong Fast-Track To SuccessBlogs
One thing I have never agreed with throughout my short 17 years of life is standardised testing.
It is common knowledge that human's brains work in a variety of different ways; different types of students are different types of learners. For example, we have the Auditory Learners - the people who learn quicker or do their best when hearing information rather than reading it. As well as Visual Learners and Kinaesthetic Learners, all of which are fairly self-explanatory.
Now, the Government are all for catering towards all 3 types when it comes to teaching in schools, giving schools grants to spend on tools such as Interactive Whiteboards, which is all well and good, but when it comes down to examination time, where does all this effort go?
Suddenly students have all of this fancy learning equipment taken from them and are simply placed in front of a rather intimidating exam paper, hearing the ever-unenthusiastic voice of an invigilator say, 'You may now begin'.
It's as if the Government have forgotten about everything they have previously preached about different types of learners.
It's a sink or swim situation when it comes to written exam papers, and I argue that the majority are mainly a test of memory. Soon enough results day comes around, and surprise surprise, many are disappointed, others are happy, some will go to good universities, the rest have to settle for something less than they expected, and in the end 'research' has apparently and unfortuantly shown that the candidates that attend good universities are more likely to reach a more successful career.
All because they were good at remembering stuff.
As Albert Einstein once said: 'Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.'
For more posts like this, you can follow Lauren's blog here: http://throughafreshpairofeyes.wordpress.com/.
Was this helpful? Yes 1